Mapping the Next 10 Years – Phase I Results!

This blog documents Phase I of the Alliance for Arts Learning Leadership’s strategic planning for Mapping the Next 10 Years. From March through June 2012 more than 280 people representing 50+ organizations from 8 counties participated in self-organized, face-to-face conversations around the question:

How can we collectively transform public education through the arts to create a better future for everyone?

Here you can find documentation and discussion of those conversations. This powerpoint  contains a synthesis of the collective vision that emerged and details Phase II steps to collective action that we will be engaged in September 2012 – March 2013.

Thank you! to everyone who participated and to the expanded Steering Committee that met monthly to digest and synthesize the information on this blog.

Profile: Susan Wolf

Name: susan wolf
Job/Role/Title: teaching artist, arts coach, visual artist, printmaker
Organization/Affiliation/School: previously Kala art institute, currently arts coach at Jefferson Elementary School
District or City/County: San Leandro
Contact info:
Email: swolfprojects [at] gmail
Website: www.susanwolfprojects.com
Twitter: @objectplace

INTERVIEW
Tell us about yourself. Who are you and what do you do? I am a parent of a recent graduate from BHS class of 2012. I am a visual and performing artist. I am a teaching artist.

How did you find out about this process? I am on the acoe mailing list. I attended the first mapping event. I enjoyed seeing the momentum and the structure that was in place to organize the comments and ideas being solicited. I am interested in learning the ways people and ideas can make connections with hopes that it will result in forward momentum.

What inspired you to get engaged? I am always thinking about how things work or… don’t work. I am ready to advocate for dramatic improvements in the current state of education.

What do you think of the conversations? I like seeing conversations being reported from meetings attended by  the… ‘deciders’ for lack of a better term. This transparency is important to see.

How would you answer the framing question: How can we collectively transform public education through the arts to create a better future for everyone? Invite the opinions from many different vantage points. Conduct interviews. Build an archive of individual stories to know who the community is. Utilize teaching artists as a catalyst, as documentarians, as interviewers.

motion made marks from susan wolf on Vimeo.

Hailing from the Chicago area a Bay Area implant since the early 80’s teaching artist Susan Wolf has worked at various East Bay school sites through Kala Art Institute’s artists-in-schools program.  As an Arts Coach at Jefferson Elementary School, Ms. Wolf matches her interest in process with her curiosity for what it means to understand. Her growing familiarity with digital media tools supports the value of making learning visible while engaging with a community of teachers interested in the practice of integrating arts.

As a performing artist her work explores the membrane of and the dialogue between her public and private personas. Wearing a mask or costumes of concealment her performances document her curious perspective of being there while being elsewhere.

As a visual artist her work makes connections with curious archaic texts and original artifacts connected to disciplines and inherent systems of biology, mathematics and mapmaking to inform a more personal re-contextualization of forms using printmaking, collage and mixed media techniques.

Wherever Curiosity Leads and Creativity Follows — by Mary Stone Hanley, George Mason University

There are many wonderful things that work in the education of young people today, however the most deeply positive work can be found wherever curiosity leads and creativity follows.  We are born curious; we want to know;  from infancy we touch, taste, reach for, wonder; and then we try to make something of it, shape it. In so doing we more throughly can understand it and transform it.   Cell phones, automobles, noodles, and rubber ducks, the Sistine Chapel, and hip hop lyrics are all a result of  human curiosity and creativy.  Wherever that spark is allowed to enter the classroom wonderful things happen.  I have seen the children involved and experienced the joy, excitement, and pride of accomplishment when they learn they are capable of answering the questions they wonder about after a process of discovery and interpretation.

The arts tap into our need to understand and to create, to change the world in so many ways–intimate and social, tiny and enormous.  The artist, whether wondering dabbler, serious student, or professional is engaged in perception, conceptualization, expression, and transformation of self, culture, and medium, all of which are at the core of making meaning of the world.  Because the struggle of transformation and expression is so personal the work becomes relevant and ownership increases.  One can see the impact on young people involved in arts-based work in the way they focus and participate.   It’s a wonderful thing we must acknowledge, educate people about, and demand room in the curriculum for.

Dr. Mary Stone Hanley, Professor, Initiative for Transformative Education, George Mason University, has been an educator in pub­lic schools and higher education for more than 35 years. She is a playwright, screenwriter, and poet. In Cultural Responsiveness, Racial Identity and Academic Success: A Review of Literature In (prepared for the Heinz Endowments, June 2009)  she highlights the necessity to employ the arts as a means to racial uplift and building on student cultural assets.

Translation and Amplification

In reflecting on the synthesis of the Map the Next 10 Years planning process posted here, and this week’s guest blogs elaborating its key points, I notice a crosscutting theme. That theme is the importance of translation and amplification.

Translate

How can we translate what matters to us; what we do well; and where we are trying to go in a way that allows us to find with others what Joe Landon refers to as “overlapping interests,” and “shared commitments?” As John Abodeely writes, when it comes to education, “thousands of people each day make decisions that impact what is taught to whom by whom and for how long,” and each of these people brings different priorities, responsibilities, and perspectives to the table. Translation is key to finding common ground within this complex picture and to forging the kinds of coalitions Abodeely suggests have impact within our messy system.

The current movement around the Common Core State Standards, which Browning Neddeau discusses, and related movements advancing the importance of deeper learning and college and career readiness, for example, represent opportunities for the arts education field to apply the power of translation. Proponents of these movements are talking about the importance of creativity, imagination, engagement, collaboration, higher-order thinking, and hands-on, student-driven, real-world, interdisciplinary learning. As a field, we have decades of experience delivering arts and arts integrated curricula that shift classroom contexts and teaching and learning to yield these outcomes. We have documented this experience through research (www.artsedsearch.org) and best practice. How might we now translate this knowledge to illuminate where our interests and commitments overlap with those of these other educational movements? And how might we articulate our expertise to help shape and advance these movements? (I think, for example, of the potential power of the arts education field translating what it has learned about preparing teachers to teach arts integrated curricula to inform the conversation about how to prepare teachers to facilitate deeper learning).

Amplify

Key to our ability to “Build on What’s Working,” is our ability to amplify our work—to make sure that others within and outside our field hear about our best practice and the knowledge that we are developing as a field. I was struck at the meeting I attended at the Alameda County Arts Learning Alliance during its mapping process, that I had not heard of several of the arts education organizations that were sitting around the table, despite the fact that they were local and doing exemplary work. What role might each of us—as funders, policymakers, artists, educators, researchers, youth, families—play in amplifying the best practice and learning in our field? How might such amplification support our ability to connect around or own work in the fruitful ways described by Audrey Brown, or connect to the work of others in the way Carl Anthony invites in his post about the environmental justice movement?

The Shift to “We” with Teacher Education Programs and Teaching Artists – Browning Neddeau, Faculty, USF and SJSU credentialing programs

The shift from “you” and “me” to “we” is highly relevant to my work in teacher education and equally as relevant to the credential students served in teacher education programs.  Teacher education is a field that is constantly evolving.  In 1983, A Nation At Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform pushed teachers to focus on accountability in student achievement.  Some states have since tied student achievement to a teacher’s salary or employment status.  This type of relationship is sometimes coined “performance-based pay”.

The latest evolution in teacher education is the understanding and appreciation of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).  A Nation At Risk, performance-based pay, and CCSS may all be well-intentioned, but all three polarize our work as professionals in education.  They push teachers to focus on student achievement in their individual classrooms and to isolate student achievement in certain content areas such as English language arts and mathematics instead of celebrating the individuality within each of us.  They encourage a departmentalized learning mentality rather than an integrated approach to learning, exploring, and growing.

Emphasizing the need for collaboration in teacher education courses may be a powerful tool as preservice teachers become inservice teachers.  This is especially true as attention grows with conversations concerning STEM to STEAM and how both of these contribute to student achievement while embracing individuality and, hence, creativity in all of us.  I predict that such conversations in teacher education courses will demand greater collaboration with teaching artists and professors in teacher education as standards-based instruction is neither new nor disappearing from the teaching profession.

Through collaboration with teaching artists, teachers can blend their skills in content pedagogy with effective and meaningful experiences in the arts.  Early experiences with teaching artists in teacher education programs will allow preservice teachers to engage in the power of art-making early in their teaching careers.

I think that engaging in a shift from “you” and “me” to “we” truly needs to be embraced early in one’s teaching career before novice teachers become “too busy” to explore alternative ways of knowing that may benefit their students tenfold.  This leaves us with the question: How shall we start this important dialogue about the shift to “we” with teacher education programs and teaching artists that is both evidence-based and rewarding for all involved in the collaborative efforts?

– Browning Neddeau
Faculty member at the University of San Francisco and San Jose State University in their multiple subjects teacher credentialing programs

Arts Education is a Political Issue

I’ve said this before (if you Google the title of this, you’ll see other stuff I’ve said about this):

Arts education is as much a political issue as it is an educational or instructional one.

This seems obvious to me, but I work at the intersection of educators and politics. This of it this way: what is taught to whom by whom and for how long are all political questions. What subjects are taught? What constitutes each subject? (Generally, these are state standards.) Who is teaching them? Who is hired to teach? How are they trained to teach? What qualifies them? Who is being taught? Which kids attend which schools? Which kids end up in which classroom? Which kids are remediated into math-only school days, for example? And, finally, for how long? Is reading a 180 minute-block session? Is the schedule block or linear? How often does the music teacher see each kid? Is it “each kid” or is it just the 5th graders? Is it just the 5th graders who aren’t in trouble?

These questions about how the education system is organized and run are answered by adults. They are not answered by the recipients of the decisions’ outcomes (the kids). They are answered by people who are paid by the system or who are elected to make decisions. They are made, secondarily, by advocates who spend their time and/or money trying to affect each decision.

A good example of the political nature of public education: any controversy over state standards. See the recent Texas debacle. Or the previous Texas debacle.

Let’s add to this daunting picture. There are multiple levels of governance: federal, state, and local. Within states, sometimes there are intermediary units such as county departments of education that sit above school districts. (In PA and other state they’re call “intermediate units.”) Within the “local” sphere there are districts and there are schools.

The federal levels includes congress and the president and the US Department of Education. The state includes the state department of education, the state board of education, the governor, etc. Locals, of course, include superintendents, their team, principals, teachers, etc.

Lest we forget the private sector: there are PTAs and other advocacy groups at the federal, state, and local level. There is the Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Diane Ravitch and other outspoken leaders and advocates. There is the national Chamber of Commerce, ALEC, the National Education Association and the AFT. There are too many to list.

In summation, thousands of people each day make decisions that impact what is taught to whom by whom and for how long. They may be high-profile controversies like the ones in Texas. They may be subtle shifts (Race to the Top teacher evaluation). They may be standard practice such as school scheduling.

So here’s my point: it is coalitions of caring individuals and organizations that do the difficult, rare, and critical work of coming to agreement about what they will do, together, as a coalition, that can impact this mess of a democratic civic institution. And this difficult, rare, and critical work is exactly what Alameda is up to.

Quest for Environmental Justice: How Arts Learning Can Help – by Carl Anthony, Co-director, Breakthrough Communities

Many years ago when I was a Professor at the University of California College of Natural Resources, teaching one of the first university based courses on environmental justice several of my students were interested in teaching about environmental issues in multi racial schools. In our class discussions one day, a young woman became emotionally upset as she was describing her work as a volunteer in an after school program at a middle school in Berkeley. She was teaching the young people about separating compost for the garden, and cans, bottles, newspapers in kitchen containers for curbside recycling. It turned out that one of a dozen young people in the after school program, was homeless. She was living with her family in a car. Her mother, father and brother carried most of their belongings with them in the car, and got rid of the trash in waste containersaround the city. My student was devastated that the child was homeless and was upset that she didn’t know how to talk about this in the after school group. She wanted to know whether homelessness was an environmental issue.

At the other end of the spectrum, I heard the story of a middle school kid from West Oakland, who got a scholarship to go to a fancy private school in Marin County. The students in his class took turns in hosting pajama parties at their large and wealthy homes. When it came to his turn to host the pajama party, this young man invited a half dozen of his classmates to spend the weekend with him in the housing project where he lived in West Oakland. The kids from Marin County loved being in the ‘hood. They didn’t want to go home.

These stories illustrate the challenges of educating kids in a time of environmental devastaion. growing inequality, media hype, and demographic change. What should the learning of students be when parents have lost their jobs? What should it be when a father or brother has been sent prison? Or has been deported? How do we help the next generation cope with the realities of life as they experience it? How can we support them in building emotional resilience, hunger for knowledge, skills and robust leadership that our society will need to create a better future for everyone? How can we support attitudes of self-respect, excitement about learning, hope for changing the world? It seems to me, the arts have an important role to play here. With their paintings and sculptures, photographs and video documentaries, music and dramas, the arts can help our young people make sense of their world, giving them the confidence to reinvent the future.

One of the most exciting movements in the world today, that is reinventing our future is, the environmental justice movement. It is a large movement that needs the nourishment and creativity of the arts, and the tools of science and technology in support of a purposeful and sustainable economy. The environmental justice movement is a large movement. It brings together the pursuit of healthy communities, the greening of our cities, the saving of energy, the creation of opportunities for everyone, the end of homelessness and hunger, social and racial justice and the quest to save the planet.

We look forward to the upcoming Summer Institute “Inventing Our Future” August 7-9, 2012, where I will join with Professor Manuel Pastor from the University of Southern California in presentations and discussion of these topics. I also look forward to joining in an afternoon workshop on “Building Healthy Healthy Communities” at the Summer Institute, led by Paloma Pavel, PhD, CoDirector of Breakthrough Communities, and Jill Ratner, President of the Rose Foundation.

Carl Anthony
Co Director
Breakthrough Communities
Oakland, California
http://www.breakthroughcommunities.info

Report from the Synthesis Team: An Emerging Roadmap

This past March, we embarked on a process to “Map the Next 10 Years.” We focused our attention on two key ideas.

The first was about making a collective impact, the idea that we should think beyond our individual organizations to how a broader “we” could coordinate creative efforts to make broad and lasting change toward student success and healthy communities.

The second was the idea that having conversations with each other about what matters most and employing authentic listening was the first step in making a collective impact.

With these key ideas in mind, we embarked on a set of self-organized conversations throughout the Bay Area around the question:

How can we collectively transform public education through the arts to create a better future for everyone?

We had three goals:

• Build muscles around network engagement: authentic, meaningful conversations, both face-to-face and online
• Align around a shared vision for 2023 and a roadmap for how to get there
• Clearly communicate this vision and plan

Since then, there have been over a dozen self-organized conversations that we know about and many more that we don’t, representing well over 100 people in total. A number of participants shared what they discussed on this blog.

The Alliance for ALL Steering Committee involved volunteer community members in a Synthesis Team that met monthly since April to make sense of the conversations that were happening and to reflect this back to the larger community.

We see five key themes emerging. At its core is a dual vision that is deeply intertwined. It starts with a Better Future for Everyone.

The path toward creating that future includes Building on What’s Working, Mapping Our Assets, and going From “You” and “Me” to “We.”

If we do these things successfully, we can create A Resilient, Sustainable System.

All five of these themes are tightly interdependent ideas with lots of overlap. I’d like to describe each of them in more detail and connect them to things the Synthesis Team has been hearing, both through this blog and directly in conversation. More importantly, I’d like to hear from you. What resonates here? What’s missing? What does this make you think about? Please add your thoughts in the comments section of this post.

A Better Future for Everyone

A strong, emerging theme from the conversations is that all of this work is ultimately about assuring that every child receives a complete education to achieve his or her greatest potential, and that every child is able to make his or her full contribution to a better future for everyone. The arts are essential to a complete education, as they uniquely engage students in school and provide opportunities to develop skills that are necessary for success in learning across the curriculum and in life.

The emerging vision is that:

1. It begins with us: you and me.  Each of us must make our personal contribution toward assuring that…
2. Every child has multiple and ongoing opportunities to grow, develop and learn in and through the arts, as an essential practice for meaning-making, idea generation and problem solving, so that…
3. Every child is purposefully engaged in school and graduates with the skills, dispositions and enthusiasm to contribute to the common good and creating a better future for everyone

Building on What’s Working

It is clear from the conversations that there are many great examples of things that are already working well. As a result of the previous strategic planning work, a professional development system has been built that connects the amazing professional development opportunities in the community (through Teaching Artists Organized) to the Integrated Learning Specialist Program, which builds leadership capacity in schools in the Bay Area that are demonstrating the power of the arts to deepen and improve learning and that are disseminated through multiple summer institutes.

Through this professional system of learning and networking, pockets of excellence become communities of practice and are influencing and shaping larger systems. At a time when public education is undergoing a huge and necessary transition, we have a foundation for working together to shape the next set of instructional practices and the next generation of assessments.

As we build on what works, we need to build on the experience of educators, students and parents. These voices are critical as we make decisions about measuring our impact, being clear about our collective objectives, defining, identifying, and agreeing on what data to look at and how to interpret success.

Mapping Our Assets

We can’t build on what’s working unless we can all collectively see what those things are. By mapping our assets, we can build on what’s working, and we can also mind the gaps.

People are our greatest assets. If we are to achieve our shared vision of a better future for everyone, it will require shared and expanded leadership among all stakeholders. We need to identify all of the different kinds of leadership that are currently being practiced, and to expand the leadership so that it is diverse, inclusive and connected.

One way to accomplish all of these things is to create spaces — both physical as well as online — for communicating about what we are all doing and identifying mutually reinforcing activities, economies of scale, and ways that expertise and resources can be leveraged to address issues of equity and access.

From “You” and “Me” to “We”

This idea emerges from a recognition that the whole is truly greater than the sum of its parts.  We can never accomplish individually what we can accomplish together. While individually we are capable of great work, lasting and sustained social change requires our united efforts.

But not everyone comes to the work from the same starting place. Some of us are passionate about bringing new audiences to arts venues, while others are passionate about professionalizing the role of the teaching artist, or developing STEAM initiatives, or addressing the unacceptable drop out rate.

We must start by honoring everyone’s reality and humanity. That starts by having authentic, meaningful conversations and by listening deeply to each other. This roadmapping process was designed to kickstart that, and it needs to continue on an ongoing basis.

As many of you have engaged in these conversations with each other, many of you have reported that you’re realizing that we all have a lot more in common than we originally thought, and that we may be holding mistaken assumptions about other people.

We need to continue to be in conversation, and to listen deeply to each other and think about how we can work with others to accomplish shared goals. We need to think about ways that we can support each other and help each other see the bigger picture and broader opportunities.

A Resilient, Sustainable System

If we:

• Share a vision for a better future for everyone crafted by assuring that all children grow, develop, and learn to their fullest potential
• Build on what’s working
• Map our assets
• Shift our mindsets from “you” and “me” to “we”

We will be able to work together across institutions and areas of expertise to influence the system as a whole to become more resilient, sustainable, supportive, and responsive to the changing needs of our communities.

What do you think? Does this resonate with you? What’s missing? We’d love to hear your thoughts.